Secure Authentication Framework based on Adaptive Sparse Features and Enhanced LSTM Networks

Authors

  • A. Kalamani RVS College of Arts and Science, Sulur, Coimbatore, India
  • M. Suganya RVS College of Arts and Science, Sulur, Coimbatore, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.61453/INTIj.20260226

Keywords:

Mean, Standard Deviation, Adaptive Sparse Feature Selection, Enhanced LSTM

Abstract

In the modern world, security has become a critical need across every domain. Among the various approaches, biometric authentication offers stronger protection compared to traditional security mechanisms. Within biometric systems, physical traits such as iris, fingerprint, and palm print, along with behavioural traits like gait, voice are widely used in all areas. Passwords have historically been the standard technique for limiting access to computer systems, however this strategy has a number of fundamental problems. Keystroke dynamics is a relatively recent biometric identification technique that offers a low-profile, reasonably priced way to make the standard login and password process more difficult. Keystroke dynamics enables user verification based on individual typing behaviour like rhythm and speed. In this study, Statistical measures including mean and standard deviation are calculated from keystroke features such as latency, duration, and digraph timing. To improve reliability and identify the optimum features, Adaptive sparse feature selection is applied, which efficiently identifies the most relevant feature subset and enhances the overall performance. For the classification phase, Enhanced LSTM models are employed to classify the users based on their typing patterns. The system’s effectiveness is evaluated using standard performance measures such as false positives, false negatives, true positives, and true negatives. Keystroke dynamics supports SDG in the way of  energy saving and reduce E-waste. The Accuracy of the system is improved while using the Adaptive Sparse with the proposed Enhanced LSTM models. This system identifies genuine users and intruders with 91% of Accuracy Rate. It is useful for more security areas.

References

Ali, M. M., Mahale, V. H., Yannawar, P., & Gaikwad, A. T. (2016). Overview of fingerprint recognition system. In 2016 International Conference on Electrical, Electronics and Optimization Techniques (ICEEOT) (pp. 1334–1338). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEEOT.2016.7754900

AlRousan, M., & Intrigila, B. (2020). A comparative analysis of biometrics types: Literature review. Journal of Computer Science, 16(12), 1778–1788. https://doi.org/10.3844/jcssp.2020.1778.1788

Blackburn, D., Miles, C., Wing, B., & Shepard, K. (2007). Biometrics overview. National Science and Technology Council, Subcommittee on Biometrics. https://www.hsdl.org/c/view?docid=464488

Desai, N., Dhameliya, K., & Desai, V. (2013). Feature extraction and classification techniques for speech recognition: A review. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 3(2), 5–9. https://www.academia.edu/73258850/Feature_Extraction_and_Classification_Techniques_for_Speech_Recognition_A_Review

Hossain, S. M. E., & Chetty, G. (2011). Human identity verification by using behavioural biometric traits. International Journal of Bioscience, Biochemistry and Bioinformatics, 1(3), 199–205. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJBBB.2011.V1.36

Karnan, M., Akila, M., & Kalamani, A. (2009). Feature subset selection in keystroke dynamics using ant colony optimization. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 1(5), 72–80. https://academicjournals.org/journal/JETR/article-abstract/B0738825442

Kumar, R., & Arun, A. (2025). Keystroke dynamics based user authentication system. Recent Trends in Artificial Intelligence, 4(2), 70–82. https://doi.org/10.46610/RTAIA.2025.v04i02.009

Leberknight, S., Widmeyer, G. R., & Recce, M. L. (2008). An investigation into the efficacy of keystroke analysis for perimeter defense and facility access. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Technologies for Homeland Security (pp. 345–350). https://doi.org/10.1109/THS.2008.4534475

Mhenni, A., Rosenberger, C., & Ben Amara, N. E. (2021). Keystroke dynamics classification based on LSTM and BLSTM models. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Design & Test of Integrated Micro & Nano-Systems (D&T) (pp. 295–298). https://doi.org/10.1109/CW52790.2021.00056

Monrose, F., & Rubin, A. D. (2000). Keystroke dynamics as a biometric for authentication. Future Generation Computer Systems, 16(4), 351–359. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-739X(99)00059-X

Okwu, M. O., & Tartibu, L. K. (2020). Metaheuristic optimization: Nature-inspired algorithms and applications. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-61111-8

Shradha, T., Chourasia, J. N., & Chourasia, V. S. (2015). A review of advancement in biometric systems. International Journal of Innovative Research in Advanced Engineering, 2(1), 22–26. https://www.ijirae.com/volumes/Vol2/iss1/30.JAEC10091.pdf

Teh, P. S., Teoh, A. B. J., Ong, T. S., & Neo, H. F. (2007). Statistical fusion approach on keystroke dynamics. In Proceedings of the Third International IEEE Conference on Signal-Image Technologies and Internet-Based Systems. pp. 918–923. https://doi.org/10.1109/SITIS.2007.46

Tripathi, K. P. (2011). A comparative study of biometric technologies with reference to human interface. International Journal of Computer Applications, 14(5), 10–15. https://doi.org/10.5120/1842-2493

Downloads

Published

2026-08-17

How to Cite

Kalamani, A., & Suganya, M. (2026). Secure Authentication Framework based on Adaptive Sparse Features and Enhanced LSTM Networks. INTI Journal, 2026(2), 217–223. https://doi.org/10.61453/INTIj.20260226

Issue

Section

Articles