MATATAG Curriculum: Challenges Experienced by Math Teachers and Students’ Academic Performance in the Initial Implementation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.61453/INTIj.20260107Keywords:
MATATAG Curriculum, Challenges, Academic PerformanceAbstract
The implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum poses challenges that significantly affect the quality of teaching and learning. Teachers faced challenges such as complicated content in the curriculum, limited opportunities for professional learning, a lack of resources, including instructional materials and technology, and proper assessment and evaluation. This study aimed to evaluate the challenges experienced by Mathematics teachers in the initial implementation of the MATATAG Curriculum (School Year 2024-2025) in the Schools Division of Bulacan, covering Grades 1, 4, and 7. It also sought to describe the implications of these challenges on instructional delivery and to examine whether teachers from the three grade levels had noticeably different experiences. The study utilized a quantitative research design involving 738 Mathematics teachers selected through stratified random sampling. Data were collected using a researcher-developed survey focusing on Content and Structure, Teacher Readiness and Professional Development, Availability of Resources, and Assessment and Evaluation. Results revealed that Mathematics teachers faced challenges with content and structure, limited training, and insufficient opportunities for collaboration, all of which affected their professional growth. Resource availability was a major constraint, particularly for early grade levels. Assessment practices were also difficult due to the lack of training in developing rubrics and implementing competency-based evaluation. While challenges were consistent across grade levels, no significant relationship was found between reported challenges and student performance, suggesting that teacher motivation and commitment helped maintain learning outcomes despite implementation difficulties.
References
Ai, X. (2022). Adjust Pearson’s r to measure arbitrary monotone dependence. School of Intelligent Engineering and Automation, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications. https://export.arxiv.org/pdf/2205.04571v7.pdf
Balansag, E., Garcia, R., Fae, A., Sintos, K., & Lazaro, B. (2024). A new era of learning: The Matatag Curriculum and its impact on fourth-grade students’ academic performance. International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary Research and Studies, 4(6), 1141–1152. https://www.multiresearchjournal.com/arclist/list-2024.4.6/id-3565
Chatzi, A., & Doody, O. (2023). The one-way ANOVA test explained. Nurse Researcher. https://journals.rcni.com/nurse-researcher/evidence-and-practice/the-oneway-anova-test-explained-nr.2023.e1885/abs
Diquito, T. (2024). Basic Education Curriculum under the newly implemented K to 10 (MATATAG) Curriculum in the Philippines: The case of science education. American Journal of Education and Technology, 3(3), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.54536/ajet.v3i3.3396
Estrellado, C. (2024). MATATAG Curriculum: Why curriculum [must] change? Journal of Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.69569/jip.2024.0001
Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics (5th ed.). SAGE Publications
Joshi, A., Kale, S., Chandel, S., & Pal, D. K. (2020). Likert Scale: Explored and explained. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 7(9), 396-403. https://doi.org/10.9734/BJAST/2015/14975
Judijanto, L., Sidabutar, H., & Kansil, I. (2024). Teacher’s dilemma: Facing endless curriculum changes. Jurnal Imiah Edukatif. https://doi.org/10.37567/jie.v10i2.3311
Kusmaryono, I., Wijayanti, D., & Maharani, H. (2022). Number of response options, reliability, validity, and potential bias in the use of the likert scale in education and social science research: A literature review. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 8(4), 625-637. https://doi.org/10.12973/ijem.8.4.625
Liu, O. (2023). Assessing student learning outcomes of higher education. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781802204193.00029
Memon, A., Rahman, A., & Memon, N. (2020). Sample size determination: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Sciences and Engineering Management, 4(2), 1-6.
Nguyen, T., Shih, M., Srivastava, D., Tirthapura, S., & Xu, B. (2021). Stratified random sampling from streaming and stored data. Distributed and Parallel Databases, 39(3), 665–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10619-020-07315-W
Pescaroli, G., Velazquez, O., Alcántara-Ayala, I., Galasso, C., Kostkova, P., & Alexander, D. (2020). A Likert scale-based model for benchmarking operational capacity, organizational resilience, and disaster risk reduction. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 11(3), 404–409. https://doi.org/10.1007/S13753-020-00276-9
Sikdar, P. (2024). Development & use of progressive techniques in Mathematics education. IIP Series, Iterative International Publisher. https://www.doi.org/10.58532/nbennurthch9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 INTI Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.